Saturday, October 19, 2013

Week 2

Welcome back everyone!

Last week I took some basic pictures of: white, black and half white half black at 3 zoom intervals to obtain a basic idea of how the pictures' properties change and what to expect.

Here's a quick review:
  • Pictures of whites have a bigger file size than of blacks.
  • Pictures of whites have a very small ISO speed whereas blacks have a very high ISO speed.
  • The further you zoom the more granulated the picture becomes and file size decreases.
This week I will be comparing actual pictures taken with the two phones, iPhone 4 and iPhone 5. I will take (in this order) a well lit outside picture, a dim outside picture, a well lit inside picture, and last but not least a dim inside picture.

Predictions? Of course. I think I will see exactly what I saw last week. Bright, well lit pictures will have a small ISO speed and a relatively big file size. Darker pictures will have a smaller file size than of bright ones and their ISO speed will be higher. I think this goes without saying, but at each zoom interval the pictures' quality will worsen and it's file size will decrease.

I am curious if I will be able to see any correlation and to draw a conclusion on differences in shutter speeds. Last week the pictures were so plain that the shutter speed pretty much stayed the same for each type of picture and I wasn't able to learn anything useful because of that.

Well, let's take some pictures!

(I apologize for the small size of these images but Blogger's editor is horrible and I was unable to format them properly. I spent couple hours trying to line them up but I was unable to, I ended up having to do it with a program and was able to upload the one long, (and small) picture you see below. You can see my attempt at formatting in the blog post below... Last week it was not a problem because the pictures were vertical, whereas this week they are horizontal and did not fit side by side really well.)


Findings: First and foremost, I was shocked how poorly the iPhone 4 handles lighting. In the bright outdoor picture the colors are very washed out and and the contrast is very high. On the flip side, in the dark room, you can barely see anything. The iPhone 5 does not have this problem. The outdoor picture is clear and sharp and the colors are right on spot and in the dark room the camera adjusts itself very well. Looking at the dim room pictures side by side it's literary almost night and day difference, the iPhone 5 gets big points here! I was also surprised with both of the outdoor pictures because the pictures that are fully zoomed are much brighter; I wonder why that is?

The ISO speed and the file size changed accordingly, just as I predicted based on what we saw last week. The brighter pictures have a larger file size than darker ones and their ISO speed is much lower.

As for the shutter speed, I think this is were it gets somewhat interesting. Last week the shutter speed was at either 1/15 or 1/20 for all of the pictures. The only small conclusion I could have drawn was that white has a slightly slower shutter speed. This week shutter speeds differed, A LOT! For the dim outdoor picture and both indoor pictures the shutter speed varied anywhere from 1/60 to 1/15. This already has a bigger difference than last week but it's still not that much. What surprised me the most was that the bright outdoor picture shutter speeds were into the thousands of a second on the iPhone5; that's fast! The more I zoomed in, the faster the shutter became. Many bright colors must result in a quicker shutter speed. On the iPhone 5 it reached a 1/2358 and iPhone 4 only reached 1/862. What's interesting is that the fastest speed was on the first picture with no zoom; it didn't grow faster as I zoomed in, as it did with the iPhone 5.

If we had a 3rd blog post it would be about the shutter speed. It got me intrigued, I want to research and do some more tests. In fact, I might even do them regardless, I want to know! Hope you guys enjoyed my little venture into smartphone photography. If you have any questions feel free to comment below or email me at mjastrzebski15@jcu.edu


Week 2: Big Mess






958 KB
ISO 50
Shutter speed: 1/30
full zoom

741KB
ISO 80
Shutter speed: 1/20
full zoom













3.0 MB
ISO 50
Shutter speed: 1/742
no zoom

       
2.3 MB
ISO 80
Shutter speed: 1/862
no zoom

1.9 MB
ISO 50
Shutter speed: 1/1938
half zoom

1.5 MB
ISO 80
Shutter speed: 1/347
half zoom

1.0 MB
ISO 50
Shutter speed: 1/2358
full zoom

1.0 MB
ISO 80
Shutter speed: 1/247
full zoom

2.4 MB
ISO 50
Shutter speed: 1/40
no zoom

1.7 MB
ISO 100
Shutter speed: 1/40
no zoom

1.7 MB
ISO 64
Shutter speed: 1/60
half zoom









1.2 MB
ISO 80
Shutter speed: 1/30
half zoom
2.6 MB
ISO 640
Shutter speed: 1/15
no zoom

2.3 MB
ISO 400
Shutter speed: 1/15
no zoom
1.6 MB
ISO 400
Shutter speed: 1/17
half zoom

1.0 MB
ISO 400
Shutter speed: 1/17
full zoom

1.6 MB
ISO 3200
Shutter speed: 1/15
no zoom

987 KB
ISO 3200
Shutter speed: 1/15
half zoom

671 KB
ISO 3200
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom














1.2 MB
ISO 640
Shutter speed: 1/15
half zoom

940 MB
ISO 500
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom

1.4 MB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
no zoom

 853 KB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
half zoom

554 KB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom


I give up.

Monday, October 14, 2013

Smartphone photography (fixed)



Hi everyone!

Cameras have always been close to my heart. It all started when my dad bought me a disposable camera so I could take my own pictures during our family vacation to Hawaii. That was the year of 1997 when I was only 5 years old. The 27 frames that the 35 mm film held, introduced me into the world of photography. Soon after I had my very own first camera, a Nikon F60 SLR, it was a Christmas present, a good one at that! Being a photographer and a technology enthusiast, I am always interested in advances related to cameras.

Today, SLRs are almost obsolete, only people that truly respect and appreciate the technology still use them. DSLRs occupy the market now; there is no more film, it's all digital. In fact, even that statement is a stretch. DSLRs are the only thing on the market, but almost nobody buys them anymore, only professional photographers do. So what do ordinary people take pictures with you ask? Phones! People don't want to carry multiple devices on them, and they don't have to! Ever since the introduction of the iPhone in 2007, people use their smartphone cameras.

Just like anything else in the world of technology, smartphones, and their cameras, are constantly being redesigned and improved. Since majority of people own smartphones and use their cameras everyday I wonder how good those cameras are. Obviously, they have to be pretty good because everyone uses them! I am also interested in how the smartphones compare to each other and whether their rate of advancement is adequate enough. So let's get to it!


I carry around an iPhone 5 which was released in September of 2012. My brother carries my old hand-me-down iPhone 4 which was released in June of 2010; 2 years apart. Let's talk about the internals of their cameras.

Both iPhones have a 1/32" (4.54x3.42 mm) sensor size and a 5x digital zoom. iPhone 4 has a 1.75 µm pixel size, 3.85 mm focal length and a F/2.8 aperture, while the iPhone 5 has a 1.4 µm pixel size, 4.10 mm focal length and F/2.4 aperture. Given these figures we can calculate the amount of mega pixels iPhone 4 and 5 have: (2592 x 1936) 5 MP and (3264 x 2448) 8 MP, respectfully.

Here are a couple of links if you are rusty or don't know what each figure represents:  techradar  lifehacker

So what do these numbers tell us? In the world of smartphones, they are competitive. You would find about the same cameras in other phones around those two years. But in comparison to actual consumer-grade DSLRs they are about 2 or 3 years behind. By no means are they revolutionary or comparable to professional cameras but they are a tenth of a size and considerably cheaper. That's where you have to draw the line. If you were in photography contest you wouldn't be using your phone, but most people are not professionals. This is why smartphone cameras occupy majority of the market; they are more than enough for quick pictures that most people take.

For my comparison of the two iPhones I will take 5 kinds of pictures with 3 zoom intervals. I will take a picture of
  • a white sheet of paper
  • a black sheet of paper
  • half black half white
  • a well lit outdoor picute
  • a dim outdoor picture
  • indoor picture
I will take the pictures with no zoom, half zoom and full zoom.
Once I have the pictures taken, I will compare their file sizes, ISO and shutter speeds.


This week I will compare the pictures of white, black and half white half black. Since black contains all of the colors, I am curious if it's file size will be much bigger than whites and in the half white half black picture if the file size will he half smaller. Obviously I do not have optimal lighting conditions so white may look gray at times, adding more colors than just pure white and contributing to a difference in file sizes, but I did the best I could. Let's get started.


             iPhone 5                                                   iPhone 4



1.2 MB
ISO 3200
Shutter speed: 1/15
no zoom

772 KB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
no zoom

688 KB
ISO 3200
Shutter speed: 1/15
half zoom
638 KB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
half zoom

485 KB
ISO 3200
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom
492 KB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom
2.2 MB
ISO 200
Shutter speed: 1/20
no zoom
1.8 MB
ISO 80
Shutter speed: 1/17
no zoom

1.3 MB
ISO 200
Shutter speed: 1/20
half zoom
1.1 MB
ISO 80
Shutter speed: 1/20
half zoom

929 KB
ISO 200
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom




 689 KB
ISO 80
Shutter speed: 1/20
full zoom

1.2 MB
ISO 1600
Shutter speed: 1/17
no zoom
1.7 MB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
no zoom

1.0 MB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
half zoom
1.2 MB
ISO 800
Shutter speed: 1/15
half zoom


817 MB
ISO 800
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom
656 KB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom




I'm actually surprised with the results. First and foremost, I was expecting pictures of black color to be bigger in file size than of whites, but in fact they were about 50% smaller. Black contains all colors whereas white doesn't contain any. I was curious if that would be reflected by the file size, and apparently it is, but it's complete opposite of what I thought it would be.
iPhone 4 has 5 megapixels and the iPhone 5 has 8 megapixels, a 37.5% increase. I was curious to find out whether or not the file sizes would show the same correlation. They don't, the file sizes range anywhere from 15% to 35.7% increase.
Another interesting observation, which I was anticipating, is that pictures of white have a very small ISO speed whereas blacks have very high ISO speed.
Onto the zoom, obviously the further you zoom the more granulated the picture becomes, especially with digital zooms. I was expecting the file sizes to decrease about 50% at mid and full zoom and for the most part they do, it's not exactly 50% each time but based on this data I think it is save to make the assumption that they generally do. There is one outlier to this generalization, on iPhone 5, the picture with no zoom and half zoom on half white half black did not change in file size; I am not exactly sure as to why.
Last but not least, the half black half white pictures. I wanted to find out if they will be half the size of a pure color. As I said before, I thought it would be black that's larger than white in file size but that's reversed. The pictures are not half of the file size, but they are in-between the two, which makes sense.

All in all, I got a lot of unexpected results. Now that I have what I think is a foundation, I wonder if I will see similar results with actual pictures of objects next week. I wonder if dimmer pictures will have a bigger file size and higher ISO speed... We'll see!

Until next week!

-Mario


Update: Someone pointed out to me that I saw inverse results with the white/black comparison because white is the color that contains all colors whereas black does not. I did some more research.

There are actually two answers here, depending on how you interpret the question.
1)Light: With light white is all of the colors. white light can be split by a prism into the rainbow and its parts. Black is no light and therefor no color.
2)Paint/physical mediums: White paint is no colors, black paint is all of the colors, this is also explained by the absorption principal of light.

Hopefully this eliminates some confusion, there is no right/wrong answer here.


Friday, October 4, 2013

Cameras everywhere!



Hi everyone!

Cameras have always been close to my heart. It all started when my dad bought me a disposable camera so I could take my own pictures during our family vacation to Hawaii. That was the year of 1997 when I was only 5 years old. The 27 frames that the 35 mm film held, introduced me into the world of photography. Soon after I had my very own first camera, a Nikon F60 SLR, it was a Christmas present, a good one at that! Being a photographer and a technology enthusiast, I am always interested in advances related to cameras.

Today, SLRs are almost obsolete, only people that truly respect and appreciate the technology still use them. DSLRs occupy the market now; there is no more film, it's all digital. In fact, even that statement is a stretch. DSLRs are the only thing on the market, but almost nobody buys them anymore, only professional photographers do. So what do ordinary people take pictures with you ask? Phones! People don't want to carry multiple devices on them, and they don't have to! Ever since the introduction of the iPhone in 2007, people use their smartphone cameras.

Just like anything else in the world of technology, smartphones, and their cameras, are constantly being redesigned and improved. Since majority of people own smartphones and use their cameras everyday I wonder how good those cameras are. Obviously, they have to be pretty good because everyone uses them! I am also interested in how the smartphones compare to each other and whether their rate of advancement is adequate enough. So let's get to it!

I carry around an iPhone 5 which was released in September of 2012. My bother carries my old hand-me-down iPhone 4 which was released in June of 2010; 2 years apart. Let's talk about the internals of their cameras.

Both iPhones have a 1/32" (4.54x3.42 mm) sensor size and a 5x digital zoom. iPhone 4 has a 1.75 µm pixel size, 3.85 mm focal length and a F/2.8 aperture, while the iPhone 5 has a 1.4 µm pixel size, 4.10 mm focal length and F/2.4 aperture. Given these figures we can calculate the amount of mega pixels iPhone 4 and 5 have: (2592 x 1936) 5 MP and (3264 x 2448) 8 MP, respectfully.

Here are a couple of links if you are rusty or don't know what each figure represents:  techradar  lifehacker

So what do these numbers tell us? In the world of smartphones, they are competitive. You would find about the same cameras in other phones around those two years. But in comparison to actual consumer-grade DSLRs they are about 2 or 3 years behind. By no means are they revolutionary or comparable to professional cameras but they are a tenth of a size and considerably cheaper. That's where you have to draw the line. If you were in photography contest you wouldn't be using your phone, but most people are not professionals. This is why smartphone cameras occupy majority of the market; they are more than enough for quick pictures that most people take.

For my comparison of the two iPhones I will take 5 kinds of pictures with 3 zoom intervals. I will take a picture of
  • a white sheet of paper
  • a black sheet of paper
  • half black half white
  • a well lit outdoor picute
  • a dim outdoor picture
  • indoor picture
I will take the pictures with no zoom, half zoom and full zoom.
Once I have the pictures taken, I will compare their file sizes, ISO and shutter speeds.


This week I will compare the pictures of white, black and half white half black. Since black contains all of the colors, I am curious if it's file size will be much bigger than whites and in the half white half black picture if the file size will he half smaller. Obviously I do not have optimal lighting conditions so white may look gray at times, adding more colors than just pure white and contributing to a difference in file sizes, but I did the best I could. Let's get started.









             iPhone 5                                                   iPhone 4



1.2 MB
ISO 3200
Shutter speed: 1/15
no zoom

772 KB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
no zoom

688 KB
ISO 3200
Shutter speed: 1/15
half zoom
638 KB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
half zoom

485 KB
ISO 3200
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom
492 KB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom
2.2 MB
ISO 200
Shutter speed: 1/20
no zoom
1.8 MB
ISO 80
Shutter speed: 1/17
no zoom

1.3 MB
ISO 200
Shutter speed: 1/20
half zoom
1.1 MB
ISO 80
Shutter speed: 1/20
half zoom

929 KB
ISO 200
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom




 689 KB
ISO 80
Shutter speed: 1/20
full zoom

1.2 MB
ISO 1600
Shutter speed: 1/17
no zoom
1.7 MB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
no zoom

1.0 MB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
half zoom
1.2 MB
ISO 800
Shutter speed: 1/15
half zoom


817 MB
ISO 800
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom
656 KB
ISO 1000
Shutter speed: 1/15
full zoom




I'm actually surprised with the results. First and foremost, I was expecting pictures of black color to be bigger in file size than of whites, but in fact they were about 50% smaller. Black contains all colors whereas white doesn't contain any. I was curious if that would be reflected by the file size, and apparently it is, but it's complete opposite of what I thought it would be.
iPhone 4 has 5 megapixels and the iPhone 5 has 8 megapixels, a 37.5% increase. I was curious to find out whether or not the file sizes would show the same correlation. They don't, the file sizes range anywhere from 15% to 35.7% increase.
Another interesting observation, which I was anticipating, is that pictures of white have a very small ISO speed whereas blacks have very high ISO speed.
Onto the zoom, obviously the further you zoom the more granulated the picture becomes, especially with digital zooms. I was expecting the file sizes to decrease about 50% at mid and full zoom and for the most part they do, it's not exactly 50% each time but based on this data I think it is save to make the assumption that they generally do. There is one outlier to this generalization, on iPhone 5, the picture with no zoom and half zoom on half white half black did not change in file size; I am not exactly sure as to why.
Last but not least, the half black half white pictures. I wanted to find out if they will be half the size of a pure color. As I said before, I thought it would be black that's larger than white in file size but that's reversed. The pictures are not half of the file size, but they are in-between the two, which makes sense.

All in all, I got a lot of unexpected results. Now that I have what I think is a foundation, I wonder if I will see similar results with actual pictures of objects next week. I wonder if dimmer pictures will have a bigger file size and higher ISO speed... We'll see!

Until next week!

-Mario